Adding Indoximod to Pembrolizumab Boosts Immune Response in Melanoma

TOP - August 2017, Vol 10, No 3 - Melanoma, Immunotherapy
Phoebe Starr

Washington, DC—Adding the investigational drug indoximod, an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway inhibitor, to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab led to higher response rates in patients with advanced melanoma than what is reported with pembrolizumab monotherapy, said lead investigator Yousef Zakharia, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Division of Hema­tology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, at the 2017 American Association for Cancer Research meeting.

The IDO pathway is a key player in cancerogenesis. Dr Zakharia presented the results of an interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial.

Previously, in the pivotal phase 3 KEYNOTE-006 clinical trial, the overall response rate (ORR) to first-line pembroliz­umab in advanced melanoma was 33%. By contrast, the ORR was 52% in the phase 2 study with the novel combination of indoximod plus pembrolizumab.

“These results justify moving the combination of indoximod plus pembrolizumab forward to a phase 3 trial,” said Dr Zakharia. “Several IDO inhibitors in development are being studied in multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies,” he said.

Study Details

The phase 2, open-label, single-arm study enrolled 102 patients with stage III (13%) or stage IV (87%) advanced, unresectable melanoma who received indoximod plus pembrolizu­mab until disease progression. Of these patients, 40 (87%) had cutaneous melanoma, 9 (15%) had ocular melanoma (a type of melanoma that has very poor response to any therapy), and 11 (18%) had nonocular melanoma.

Patients could switch to a second checkpoint inhibitor (primarily ipilimumab) at disease progression and continue receiving indoximod.

Of the 60 patients who were evaluable for response, 31 (52%) achieved ORR; 6 achieved a complete response (CR) and 25 achieved a partial response. Of the 51 patients with cutaneous or nonocular melanoma, 30 (59%) achieved ORR; 6 achieved a CR and 24 achieved a partial response. The disease control rate (ie, response plus stable disease) was 73% in the overall patient population and 80% in the group with cutaneous or nonocular melanoma.

“This is the largest publicly available data set on IDO inhibitors plus checkpoint inhibitors,” Dr Zakharia noted.

In this study, as in other studies of different therapies, patients with ocular melanoma had a poor response to the combination therapy.

“We had impressive responses in nonocular melanoma, with many patients near CR,” said Dr Zakharia. The majority of the responses occurred within the first months of treatment.

The indoximod combination was well-tolerated. The majority of adverse events were as expected, with few grade 3 adverse events and no grade 4 adverse events. Serious adverse events potentially related to indoximod therapy were reported in 4 patients (ie, grade 3 arthritis, gastritis, and hearing impairment; and grade 2 interstitial nephritis), and 3 of these patients discontinued treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Priming the Immune Response

Dr Zakharia and colleagues were not able to identify biomarkers for response in the patients studied to date, although there was a suggestion for an improved response with elevated PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

“One could arguably say that the combination appears to get a better response with higher PD-L1 expression, but this needs to be interpreted with caution,” he said.

The press conference moderator, Louis M. Weiner, MD, Director, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, called these results “exciting,” and, if validated, “would represent a real advance.”

“It’s too soon to tell, but the approach of priming the immune response with novel strategies looks promising,” said Dr Weiner. “It will be a vigorous competition among ways to manipulate checkpoint inhibitors, but we don’t know who will win,” he added.

Related Items
Updates on Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma
Meg Barbor, MPH
TOP - May 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on May 1, 2018 in Melanoma, HOPA 2018 Highlights
Apalutamide and Enzalutamide Each Delays Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Approximately 2 Years
Phoebe Starr
TOP - May 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on May 1, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Upper-Tract Urothelial Cancer Shows Impressive Gains in the POUT Trial
Phoebe Starr
TOP - May 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on May 1, 2018 in Urothelial Cancer
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor plus VEGFR Inhibitor Combo Outperforms Sunitinib in Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Phoebe Starr
TOP - May 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on May 1, 2018 in Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Which Combination Immunotherapies to Use, and When? High Response Rates, but Serious Toxicity Remains a Concern
Chase Doyle
TOP Web Exclusives published on April 9, 2018 in Immunotherapy
Venetoclax plus Rituximab New Chemotherapy-Free Option for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Phoebe Starr
TOP Web Exclusives published on April 9, 2018 in Leukemia
A New Combination as First-Line Regimen in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma?
Phoebe Starr
TOP Web Exclusives published on April 9, 2018 in Lymphoma
Combining Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy Shows Good Synergy
Chase Doyle
TON - March 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on March 9, 2018 in Immunotherapy, Conference Correspondent
Emerging Safety Data with Checkpoint Inhibitors
Phoebe Starr
TON - November 2017, Vol 10, No 6 published on November 27, 2017 in Conference Correspondent
Psychological Distress in Patients with Cancer Warrants Attention
Phoebe Starr
TON - November 2017, Vol 10, No 6 published on November 27, 2017 in Conference Correspondent
Last modified: August 2, 2017