Estrogen Alone Poses No Increased Breast Cancer Risk

Web Exclusives - Breast Cancer, In the News

SAN ANTONIO—A re-analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)—which found an increased risk of breast cancer and heart disease in women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT)—suggests that estrogen alone, without progesterone, may actually be protective against breast cancer. 

“This information was downplayed by the WHI at the time. We analyzed the two trials and did tests for interactions, comparing estrogen alone with estrogen plus progestin. We found a significant reduction in risk of breast cancer with estrogen alone, compared with a significant increase with the hormonal combination,” said Joseph Ragaz, MD, of the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, Canada, who reported findings at the 33rd annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.                     

The combined studies involved more than 25,000 healthy women. The first WHI trial (WHI1) evaluated estrogen (Premarin 0.625 mg/day) plus progestin (Provera 2.5 mg/day) versus placebo, and the second (WH2), which was limited to women without a uterus, evaluated estrogen alone (Premarin 0.625 mg/day) versus placebo. A comparative analysis assessed breast cancer rates between the two studies and according to the women’s risk for breast cancer (Gail score), hormone use before the study, and other factors.

 

”The study found that HRT based on estrogen alone was significantly protective against the development of breast cancer, reducing the incidence by 20%; combined HRT, on the other hand, actually increased the risk by 25%,” he said. 

By Gail score, women at low-to-medium risk (<1.75 score) had a relative risk reduction of 29% with estrogen alone, while on estrogen plus progestin their risk increased by 25%, Ragaz reported.

In women without any previous hormone use, estrogen alone was significantly more protective, with a 34% reduction in events. Estrogen plus progestin was associated with a 16% increased risk, he added. 

A subset of patients had a low risk for developing breast cancer, based on Gail score <1.75, no previous HRT before the study, no positive family history of breast cancer, and no personal history of benign breast disease. In these women, the risk of developing breast cancer was reduced by 20% altogether, and by as much as 43% if they had no history of benign breast disease. 

In addition, estrogen alone, at least in some age groups, was significantly protective against coronary heart disease, colorectal cancer, and hip fracture, Ragaz added. 

“A prospective evaluation of HRT is now required to establish the best regimens and formulation of HRT based on estrogen alone, and with or without a safer new progestin combination,” Ragaz said. “It is very important to look into new generation progestins that are more natural.” New compounds—one is called prometrium—are in development, he said.

Based on these findings, he believes that for a subset of women aged 60 and younger estrogen alone might be safely used. In particular, these would be younger women who had undergone hysterectomy and did not need the protective effect of progestin against endometrial cancer

Related Items
Breast Cancer Year in Review Introduction
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Retrospective Analysis Provides Insight into Treatment-Emergent Neutropenia Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib or Palbociclib
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Concurrent Use of Medications with Potential Drug–Drug Interactions: Real-World Analysis of Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant Provides Statistically Significant Benefit as First- and Second-Line Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Preliminary Results from a Phase 2 Trial of Fulvestrant/Palbociclib as First-Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Endocrine-Sensitive Advanced Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Ribociclib Added to Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer Demonstrated Favorable Quality-of-Life Results
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Examining Different Sequence Effects of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Combinations on Actual Real-World Outcomes of Treatment in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive and HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Benefit of Alpelisib When Combined with Fulvestrant as Demonstrated Through Biomarker Subanalysis from the SOLAR-1 Study
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 20, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Efficacy Outcomes of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 20, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Retrospectively Analyzing the Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors to Treat Adult Female Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 20, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Last modified: April 27, 2020