Venetoclax plus Rituximab New Chemotherapy-Free Option for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Web Exclusives - Leukemia

 

Venetoclax plus Rituximab New Chemotherapy-Free Option for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Atlanta, GA—Venetoclax (Venclexta) plus rituximab (Rituxan) achieved superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-of-care bendamustine (Treanda/Bendeka) plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PFS improved by 81% and OS by 52% with venetoclax plus rituximab, and the depth of response was impressive—complete response and complete response with incomplete platelet recovery was 26.8%, and minimal residual disease negativity in peripheral blood was 83.5%.

These findings from an interim analysis of the phase 3 clinical trial MURANO were reported at ASH 2017.

“This is the first randomized trial comparing any of the new agents targeted to treat CLL against a standard chemoimmunotherapy program, and it has proved the superiority of the chemotherapy-free approach,” said lead investigator John F. Seymour, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, Director, Haematology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

“These findings suggest that venetoclax plus rituximab could be a standard option for relapsed or refractory CLL. There is also evidence of eradication of detectable disease that opens the prospect of time-limited therapy in this setting,” Dr Seymour continued.

A total of 389 patients were randomized to oral venetoclax 400 mg once daily, given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, for a maximum of 2 years, plus rituximab for 6 cycles versus 6 cycles of bendamustine plus rituximab. In the venetoclax arm, the dose was gradually increased to 400 mg daily over 4 to 5 weeks to reduce the likelihood of tumor lysis syndrome.

All patients had 1 to 3 previous lines of therapy. Approximately 27% of patients in both arms had deletion 17p.

The median PFS was not yet reached in the venetoclax arm versus 17 months in the bendamustine arm at a median follow-up of 23.8 months, representing an 83% risk reduction for disease progression favoring the experimental arm (P <.0001). The PFS results were consistent across subgroups, with responses seen in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics, as well as in those with good or intermediate risk.

The secondary end points favored the venetoclax arm, including OS. Patients who received venetoclax plus rituximab had a 52% reduced mortality risk. At 2 years of follow-up, the median OS was not reached in either arm.

Serious adverse events were reported in 46% of patients receiving venetoclax plus rituximab versus in 43% of those receiving bendamustine plus rituximab. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in 82% and 70% of patients, respectively. The causes of death were balanced between the 2 arms.

Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia were more common in the venetoclax arm than in the bendamustine arm (58% vs 39%, respectively). Infections were relatively infrequent. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 3% of patients in the venetoclax arm versus in 1% of patients in the bendamustine arm.

“Today’s phase 3 MURANO study suggests that venetoclax/rituximab will be practice-changing. We are getting away from chemotherapy and avoiding alkylating agents,” said ASH Secretary Robert A. Brodsky, MD, who moderated the press briefing.

Related Items
Retrospective Study of Single Cord Blood Transplantation for Patients with AML Aged ≥60 Years
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Enasidenib Monotherapy with Addition of Azacitidine in Nonresponders Effective in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed, IDH2-Mutated AML
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
The HARMONY Alliance: Novel Insights into Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Characteristics and Prognostic Effects of IDH Mutations Across the Age Spectrum in AML: A Collaborative Analysis
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Effect of Early Blood Counts on Response and Overall SurvEffect of Early Blood Counts on Response and Overall Survival Following Glasdegib + LDAC in Newly Diagnosed AMLival Following Glasdegib + LDAC in Newly Diagnosed AML
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Venetoclax plus Standard Intensive AML Induction/Consolidation with FLAG-IDA in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed/Refractory AML
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Clinical Outcomes for Treatment-Naïve Patients with AML Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Azacitidine or Decitabine
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
SAL-DaunoDouble Trial Interim Analysis: Single versus Double Induction with 7+3 for Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Prognostic Significance of Concomitant Gene Mutations in Intensively Treated Patients with IDH1/2 Mutated AML
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Decitabine + Venetoclax versus Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory AML: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis
2020 Year in Review - AML published on December 17, 2020 in Leukemia
Last modified: April 27, 2020